Islamic Financial Arrangements Used in Islamic Banking

Written by admin on May 21st, 2011

the lease period – (permissible if mutually agreed-upon)

4. Future date. Agreement to commence lease on some future date is allowed. However, the rent has to commence from the date of delivery. If the lessee has paid the price and delivery of the asset is delayed by the supplier, then no rent is liable to be paid for the period of delay. It must be noted that future or forward sale in sale/purchase transaction is not permissible in SHARIA’H. This is another major point after ownership transfer which differentiates leasing from a sale/purchase transaction under SHARIA’H.

5. Acquisition of an asset by the lessee. For various reasons, the asset subject to lease may be acquired by the lessee and payment may be disbursed? Through him by the lessor. This is permissible under SHARIA’H on the principles of agent and principal. Here there are two relationships separate from and independent of one and other. The first relationship is that before becoming a lessee, an individual acts as an agent for and behalf of the lessor to acquire the asset. This is an independent arrangement. Once the asset has been acquired with all the risk and reward of ownership to the lessor, then a second relationship is created i.e. the lessor and the lessee under the lease agreement. That cost of acquisition shall be borne by the lessor being owner and not by the lessee.

6. Rentals.

1. Advance rentals are admissible subject to the condition of adjustment against the actual rental when due upon commencement of the lease as discussed before.

2. Unilateral increase by the lessor is not permissible even if stipulated in the contract.

3. Bench marks. The fixing of any bench mark for determining the amount of rent, as with an inflation index etc., is permissible provided that the lease agreement clearly stipulates the same e.g. if the inflation rate as declared by an authoritative body like the State Bank etc. is said to be 10% per annum, then the rent can be increased every year by that percentage.

7. Penalty for late payment of rentals. Penalty or compensation for late payment is not permissible. Rentals once due become a debt obligation or monetary asset which cannot generate profit under SHARIA’H. This situation has been exploited by unscrupulous lessees. In such circumstances, contemporary scholars have provided a solution whereby a penalty can be charged to the lessee for delayed payment though the amount recovered is only to be used for charitable purposes by the lessor. In other words, the late payment charges cannot be taken as income by the lessor. A suitable clause, therefore, is to be incorporated into the lease agreement to avoid any misunderstanding in this regard.

8. Premature termination of lease. Premature termination of lease is allowed provided that the lessee has violated or contravened the terms of the lease or it is by mutual consent of the lessee and the lessor. Any unilateral or unconditional termination of the lease either by the lessor or the lessee without prior notification is contrary to the principles of justice and equity, hence not allowed under SHARIA’H.

9. Repossession of an asset. In the event of early termination, or upon maturity of the term of lease, assets have to return to the lessor unless he voluntarily relinquishes his rights or makes a gift of the leased assets to the lessee. However, rent would be payable only up to the date of termination and not beyond. Entitlement or the right of the lessor to claim rent from any period after termination, even if expressly stipulated in the contract, is not valid under SHARIA’H.

10. Residual value. It is accepted under SHARIA’H that ownership of the asset belongs to the lessor and, therefore, assets should revert back to him upon expiry of the lease. Any stipulation to the contrary in the contract that the lessor can sell or transfer the asset to the lessee upon the expiry of the term of the lease at a pre-determined price called residual value is not considered valid from the point of view of SHARIA’H However, this point is currently a subject matter of debate among contemporary scholars. They are of the view that if a lessor unilaterally undertakes or promises to transfer the ownership to the lessee as a gift or at a token price separate from the lease agreement, then this can be considered validly binding on the lessor at the option of the lessee.

11. What is important is that under SHARIA’H the leasing and sale/purchase transactions are two separate things and should not be mixed up in one contract, as both are independent and governed by separate rules. Nothing, however, in SHARIA’H stops the lessor from giving away the ownership of his assets at his own discretion or good will toward the lessee at any mutually agreed-upon price or as a gift upon the expiry of the leasing contract.

12. Sale and lease back. This is allowed, but only as two separate transactions. That in the first place there is a sale of assets to be purchased by the lessor. This is governed by SHARIA’H rules of sale/purchase at a fair market value. Once the ownership title is validly passed on to the lessee, a lease transaction can then be executed separately through a lease agreement.

13. Sub-lease. Sub-lease by the lessee is permissible under SHARIA’H subject to the consent of the lessor and can be expressly outlined in the lease agreement. In SHARIA’H, however, there are divergent views if the rent arising from the sub-lease is higher than the rent payable on the original lease. Some scholars allow the differential to be retained by the lessee while others feel that the surplus received from the sub-lease should be passed on to the owner i.e. main lessor.

14. Assigning of the lease. Also permissible under SHARIA’H, the lessor can sell the leased assets to a third party along with his rights and obligations. The relationship between lessor and lessee in this case will be determined between the new owner and the lessee. However, the lessor cannot assign the lease without transferring the ownership for monetary consideration. Here the basic SHARIA’H cornerstone of asset-back transaction is not there. Rent receivables are debt obligation which cannot therefore be transacted for a monetary price. Assignment of lease rentals without monetary consideration is, however, not prohibited in SHARIA’H.

15. Securing of the lease. Leased assets can be secured along the same principles governing the assignment i.e. ownership of assets along with the rent. Rent alone without ownership of the assets cannot be secured for the reason of being a debt obligation as discussed before. Securing a lease can be made wholly or partly to one party or to a number of persons. Documentation has to be carefully prepared to ensure the securing instrument represents assets and not the debt or monetary obligation alone. [5]

Some Difficulties

Major hurdles faced by Islamic finance houses are the absence of a necessary legal framework and the lack of adequate infrastructure in the banking and investment fields. [6]

The modern banking system is based on the concept that money should be treated like any other factor of production and must earn some return over a period of time. It is argued that the establishment of large-scale enterprises, and hence material progress, is not possible unless there is an agency that can mobilize financial resources from the public by paying them some interest, while lending these resources to entrepreneurs. By charging these entrepreneurs a higher interest, these agencies were able to utilize the difference (called a spread) to meet their expenses and to make some profit for the owners of the agency (i.e. share-holders). Banks were established to fulfill this need and from the beginning were only authorized to perform this function. They were legally prohibited from entering into trade or industry. When the Government of IRAN decided to introduce an interest-free banking system, this prohibition was removed. After a lot of in-house the banks were told that they were allowed to deal in only 1 to 12 means of financing (only two were classified as “Financing by Lending”).

These two permitted lending without interest by charging the actual expense incurred by the banks to meet their cost of operation and QARDE AL’HASANA. All the rest were either trade-related or investment-type models. These included the purchase of goods by banks and their sale to clients at an appropriate mark-up price on a deferred payment basis, in case of default there being no further mark-up. This sale of goods on mark-up is known as MURABIHA. Other types of financing were hire-purchase, leasing, MUSHARIKA or profit- and-loss-sharing, equity participation and purchase of shares, etc.

Since MURABIHA was the type nearest to lending and since it did not require any expertise in buying and selling commodities, bankers limited most of their financing to this type. In order to eliminate the risk of prospective buyers refusing to accept goods purchased by the banks by reason of not being strictly in accordance with the specifications, banks were allowed to appoint the prospective buyer as their agent for the purchase of the goods and later for the sale of the goods to the buyer’s firm. Furthermore, to give as much leeway to the banks, as safeguards of public money, as possible, the ULAMA did not fix a waiting period between the two stages of buying and selling.

The banks did not assume the role of trader and MORABIHA

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply