Business Valuation
Written by admin on May 23rd, 2011those companies except that they carry a restriction that prevents them from being traded on the open market for a certain period of time, which is usually one year (two years prior to 1990). This restriction from active trading, which amounts to a lack of marketability, is the only distinction between the restricted stock and its freely-traded counterpart. Restricted stock can be traded in private transactions and usually do so at a discount. The restricted stock studies attempt to verify the difference in price at which the restricted shares trade versus the price at which the same unrestricted securities trade in the open market as of the same date. The underlying data by which these studies arrived at their conclusions has not been made public. Consequently, it is not possible when valuing a particular company to compare the characteristics of that company to the study data. Still, the existence of a marketability discount has been recognized by valuation professionals and the Courts, and the restricted stock studies are frequently cited as empirical evidence. Notably, the lowest average discount reported by these studies was 26% and the highest average discount was 45%.
Option pricing
In addition to the restricted stock studies, U.S. publicly traded companies are able to sell stock to offshore investors (SEC Regulation S, enacted in 1990) without registering the shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The offshore buyers may resell these shares in the United States, still without having to register the shares, after holding them for just 40 days. Typically, these shares are sold for 20% to 30% below the publicly traded share price. Some of these transactions have been reported with discounts of more than 30%, resulting from the lack of marketability. These discounts are similar to the marketability discounts inferred from the restricted and pre-IPO studies, despite the holding period being just 40 days. Studies based on the prices paid for options have also confirmed similar discounts. If one holds restricted stock and purchases an option to sell that stock at the market price (a put), the holder has, in effect, purchased marketability for the shares. The price of the put is equal to the marketability discount. The range of marketability discounts derived by this study was 32% to 49%.
Pre-IPO studies
Another approach to measure the marketability discount is to compare the prices of stock offered in initial public offerings (IPOs) to transactions in the same company’s stocks prior to the IPO. Companies that are going public are required to disclose all transactions in their stocks for a period of three years prior to the IPO. The pre-IPO studies are the leading alternative to the restricted stock stocks in quantifying the marketability discount. The pre-IPO studies are sometimes criticized because the sample size is relatively small, the pre-IPO transactions may not be arm’s length, and the financial structure and product lines of the studied companies may have changed during the three year pre-IPO window.
Applying the studies
The studies confirm what the marketplace knows intuitively: Investors covet liquidity and loathe obstacles that impair liquidity. Prudent investors buy illiquid investments only when there is a sufficient discount in the price to increase the rate of return to a level which brings risk-reward back into balance. The referenced studies establish a reasonable range of valuation discounts from the mid-30%s to the low 50%s. The more recent studies appeared to yield a more conservative range of discounts than older studies, which may have suffered from smaller sample sizes. Another method of quantifying the lack of marketability discount is the Quantifying Marketability Discounts Model (QMDM).
Tags: . distinguish between a financial investor and a strategic, aggregate amount bank account, aggregate bank account, aggregate value finance, aggregate value of account, aggregate value of bank account, asset, business, business assets, business buyer, business purchase, business valuation, business value, buy sell agreements, CAP-M, capital, collateral documentation, comparing strategic investor and financial investor, corporation, Depository, difference between financial investor and a strategic investor, difference between financial investor and strategic investor, difference financial investor, difference financial investor and strategic investor, discretion, distiguish between financial investor and strategic investor, distinction between financial investor and strategic investor, distinguish between a financial investor and a strategic investor, distinguish between financial investor and strategic investor, distuinguish between strategic investor & financial investor, divorce litigation, economic income, economic value, equity, flow, gift taxation, going concern, government, how to work out highest aggregate, Ibbotson, income, industry, instance, ion, legal disputes, logo, management resources, Model, optimal, ownership interest, pricing, purchase price allocation, shell climate change, shell fuel price, shell future fuel, shell pension investment jobs, shell recruitment accounting or commercial or finance or hr or management or pension or investment or procurement or supply or support, stock, tax valuation, tc/rc copper benchmark, time, type, valuation, valuation assignment, valuator, value, volatility, wacc, what does "aggregate value of bank account" mean, what is highest aggregate value, willing buyer, willing seller